-
Text
1
Notes Piece of shit baby daddy.Yeah, good luck with that, asshole.
-
Photo
1
Notes
My son’s sweet wee Jordans. He’s big pimpin, and he isn’t even out of the womb yet. And I can’t help but wonder how much those cost. I’m glad we got them for free. ;D
-
Chat
17581
NotesConservative: Legalizing gay marriage will destroy the sanctity of traditional marriage. Intelligent person: Well, what about divorce? Doesn't divorce destroy the sanctity of traditional marriage as well? If so, why aren't you against divorce? What about people like Kim Kardashian who get married for three months and then get divorced? Should we ban her from ever getting married again? I didn't think so. Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will open the doors to other types of marriage, like being able to marry your dog, family member, or several people at once. Intelligent person: People thought the same thing about interracial marriage and it's been legal for quite some time now. I don't recall any doors being opened to interspecies marriage because of interracial marriage. Furthermore, there are several states that allow you to marry your first cousin and I believe that door was opened by traditional marriage, not gay marriage. Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will redefine the word "marriage". Intelligent person: Words are redefined every day and people don't seem to mind. If they redefined the word "marker", would you protest it because "marker" has had a set definition for years? Switching around a few words so that same-sex couples are included in the definition cannot and will not affect your existing marriage in any way, shape, or form. Conservative: Marriage is about reproducing. Two people of the same sex cannot reproduce. Intelligent person: What about sterile men and infertile women? They're still allowed to get married. Why not ban that as well? And if you want to get technical, gay couples can reproduce via a surrogate, but that's probably a little too technical for you, Mr. Conservative. Conservative: Legalizing gay marriage will devalue existing traditional marriages. Intelligent person: If two total strangers living several hundred miles away from you getting married affects your marriage somehow, then I don't think your marriage was that strong to begin with. Conservative: The Bible states that marriage is between a man and a woman. Intelligent person: The Bible says a lot of things, but this country is not governed by what the Bible says. This country is governed by what the Constitution says and the first amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Conservative: Marriage and family go hand-in-hand. In order to properly raise a child, the child must have a mother and a father. If we legalize gay marriage and same-sex couples raise children, the children will grow up confused. Intelligent person: A child does not need to have both a mother and a father in order to grow up secure and successful. If you don't believe me, you can visit the man who lives in the White House. As for same-sex couples raising children, several scientific studies have concluded that being raised by same-sex parents does not affect a child's self-esteem, gender identity, or emotional health. Conservative: Gay marriage is against my religious belief and as an American I reserve the right to religious freedom. Intelligent person: Really? Gays getting married will not take your religious freedom away. You're allowed to believe in whatever you want, but you're not allowed to try and impose your beliefs on me by trying to take my rights away. That is not religious freedom. -
Photo
2898
Notes
Classic.
That’s pretty much the actual criticism of the bill. The GOP likes what’s in it, but not that President Obama is related to it. They hate him like the bubonic plague!
-
Text
That awkward moment when someone you barely know or talk to says they love you.
And you just don’t reply.
-
Photos
190374
Notes -
Text
“I’ll try to feel better.” is code for “I’m definitely crying myself to sleep tonight.”
-
Photo
139
Notes
The most precious gift we can offer others is our presence. When mindfulness embraces those we love, they will bloom like flowers.
Thich Nhat Hanh
(Source: lazyyogi, via spreadloveandkindness)
-
Photo
668
Notes
(Source: wildlifebiology, via sparklybongwater)
-
Link
5
Notes : I'm hardly on Tumblr anymore.
Oh, I’m totally ready. Although my wardrobe isn’t. I don’t think I have hardly any larger summer clothes. And let’s hope to god I can still fit in my swimsuit from last year. :P
Yeah, but you’re my real life friend, so you’re supposed to care. :P It’s not like I have…It makes me sad. I feel like I need to get back to posting about everything, because everyone cares so much.
ii cccaaarrreee :C
-
Text
5
Notes I’m hardly on Tumblr anymore.
Yeah, but you’re my real life friend, so you’re supposed to care. :P It’s not like I have much to post about nowadays anyway. “Ooh, I sat inside all day and did nothing productive at all”. That’s about it. Other than trying to get out of ECOT and baby related things I don’t have much to talk about anymore. But now that it’s slowly starting to get nice out maybe I’ll get out and see people more. Sunshine would do me some good. And also, I think Justin and I plan to spend a lot of summer at the river and the creek by my house. So when it warms up you and Cheyenne should come swim with us or something.It makes me sad. I feel like I need to get back to posting about everything, because everyone cares so much.
ii cccaaarrreee :C
-
Text
5
Notes I’m hardly on Tumblr anymore.It makes me sad. I feel like I need to get back to posting about everything, because everyone cares so much.
-
Photo
173
Notes
The richest get richer
The aftermaths of the Great Recession and the Great Depression produced sharply different changes in U.S. incomes that tell us a lot about tax and economic policy.
The 1934 economic rebound was widely shared, with strong income gains for the vast majority, the bottom 90 percent.
In 2010, we saw the opposite as the vast majority lost ground.
National income gained overall in 2010, but all of the gains were among the top 10 percent. Even within those 15.6 million households, the gains were extraordinarily concentrated among the super-rich, the top one percent of the top one percent.
Just 15,600 super-rich households pocketed an astonishing 37 percent of the entire national gain.
The different results in 1934 and 2010 show how a major shift in federal policy hurts the vast majority and benefits the super-rich.
-
Photos
336
Notes(Source: enaitz, via contradict)
-
Photo
33
Notes
